Milpa Gardens
Sign in

Leer en español

Some plants can't fruit from their own pollen

Some plants can't fruit from their own pollen, so they need a second plant of a different variety nearby.

As recorded: Self-incompatible species require 2+ genetically distinct plants.

Well established A person has checked it against its sources. If you skip this, you lose real yield. The planner warns you.

How it works

Many fruit trees carry self-incompatibility alleles at a single locus. When a pollen grain shares an allele with the pistil it lands on, the pistil rejects it and no seed sets. A plant's own pollen always shares its alleles, so it cannot fertilize itself. Neither can a second tree of the identical variety, which is genetically the same. Fertilization needs pollen from a genetically distinct plant.

What to do about it

Plant at least two, and where the species needs a second cultivar make them different varieties. Two of the same will not pollinate each other.

The evidence

Evidence: checked against 2 sources in the research-based literature.

The 2 sources

extension.psu.edu

Pollination Requirements for Various Fruits and Nuts Penn State Extension
Chestnut, Chinese: All are self-sterile. Two or more varieties or seedling trees are necessary to ensure adequate cross-pollination.

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Pollen-Pistil Interaction in Response to Pollination Variants in Subtropical Japanese Plum (Prunus salicina Lindl.) Varieties
Japanese plum exhibits gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI), a prezygotic reproductive barrier where genetically related pollen is rejected by the pistil ... governed by a polymorphic locus (S) ... Self-incompatibility occurs when the same S-allele is expressed in the haploid pollen grain and the diploid pistil.

Plant teams that rest on it

Read next

How this rule has changed

Every change is dated, newest first. The full record, with each reason, is in the data download.

Cite this page

Milpa Gardens. “Some plants can't fruit from their own pollen, so they need a second plant of a different variety nearby.” Evidence grade: Well established. https://milpa.garden/rules/self-incompatible-species-require-2-genetically-distinct/

A garden planner built on graded evidence. Every claim states its evidence grade and links its sources on the page. Cite it with the grade, and add the date you read it.

See this rule in the planner

Report a problem with this claim

How we grade evidence

Well established
The rule names its mechanism and is settled, by sources a person has read and checked or by plain arithmetic and geometry.
Promising
The mechanism is named and the literature backs it. A few questions are still open.
A good hunch
Plausible by its mechanism, but field studies are thin, so treat it as a lean.
Contested
The evidence points both ways, or no study has tested it, so the planner does not enforce it.
Refuted
The claim did not survive its sources. It is kept so the folklore can be answered.

More on what each grade means

All rules · Folklore, checked