Milpa Gardens
Sign in

Leer en español

What the evidence says about companion planting

Most companion-planting chart entries are tradition, and few were ever tested. Here's the short list of pairings that hold up, the famous ones that don't, and how to tell which is which.

A field of yellow marigolds in full bloom beneath a stand of coconut palms under a clear blue sky
Photo: Ezhuttukari · CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

What you need

Companion planting is the most popular garden idea with the least evidence behind it. The familiar charts (carrots love tomatoes, this plant “protects” that one) are largely tradition and hearsay copied from book to blog to book, and most of the pairings have never been tested. Some of it is still real. You have to sort the few real effects from the many folk ones, and this planner is built to do that.

Why don't you have a companion planting chart?

Start with what the charts assume, that a grid of “good neighbors” encodes real relationships:

Companion planting charts encode real relationships.

Refuted

Most companion-planting advice you'll find online is folklore, and the charts have no scientific basis. A few pairings do have real mechanisms. Here's what we can actually defend, and why.

What is known

Companion-planting charts are not a record of tested relationships. The idea is old. Plants were once matched by the four elements and the signs of the zodiac, and later by pseudoscientific methods such as sensitive crystallization of plant extracts, and there is no scientific basis for any of the lists. A minority of pairings do have real, named mechanisms: mixed plantings confuse pests hunting for their host plant by sight and smell, a squash canopy works as a living mulch, and diverse plantings keep beneficial predators and parasitoids around. Those are recorded here as a good hunch. Most chart entries have nothing behind them.

The source

s3.wp.wsu.edu

The Myth of Companion Plantings Washington State University Extension, Linda Chalker-Scott
There is no scientific basis, however, for any of the several lists that exist describing

The corpus refutes the deeper assumption underneath it outright, that putting plants together makes them a functioning team:

Any vegetables planted together help each other

Refuted

The planner won’t plan around this claim. What is known instead is below.

What is known: Some plant teams rest on a real way one plant acts on another. A kitchen bundle says only that you'll want these things in the same bowl. Both are good ways to plant. Only the first has plants working on each other.

Evidence: settled without a trial (definition).

Read the full rule › · open in the planner ›

A real plant team names a mechanism you can state and check. A chart names a pairing and asks you to trust it.

Which companion pairings hold up?

A few things in this territory are supported, and they earn their place by naming a mechanism:

The planner carries hedged versions of the companion claims that have some support, each graded for exactly how sure we are:

Insectary plants near fruiting crops increase pollinator and predator visitation.

A good hunch

If you skip this, it still grows, just less well. The planner suggests it.

How it works: The flowers supply nectar and pollen that adult predators and parasitoids feed on, so a patch of them near a fruiting crop keeps those beneficial insects fed and close by to work the crop. The effect is real but not guaranteed. An insectary patch does not always suppress pests.

Evidence: checked against 1 source in the research-based literature.

The source

ipm.ucanr.edu

Insectary Plants UC Statewide IPM Program (UC IPM)
Insectary plants are those grown to attract, feed, and shelter insect parasites (parasitoids) and predators to enhance biological pest control. Insectary plants provide nectar and pollen, which the adults of many natural enemy species need to consume.

Read the full rule › · open in the planner ›

Aromatic species interplanted with brassicas are reported to reduce cabbage-worm damage. The mechanism is unresolved and trial results are mixed.

A good hunch

If you skip this, it still grows, just less well. The planner suggests it.

How it works: Unresolved, and we don't pick one. Two explanations have been proposed. The herbs' volatile oils (their scent) may mask the cues pests use to find the host plant, or they may disrupt the pests' landing. The trials that report an effect measured damage, which can't separate fewer eggs laid from fewer larvae surviving or more predators arriving. So no mechanism here is established; there are only candidates.

Evidence: checked against 1 source in the research-based literature.

The source

extension.umn.edu

Companion planting in home gardens Univ. of Minnesota Extension
In an Iowa study, thyme, onion and nasturtium helped to reduce cabbage looper and imported cabbageworm damage in broccoli

Plus 4 working notes on how the sources were read.

Read the full rule › · open in the planner ›

Alliums interplanted with carrots reduce carrot rust fly damage.

A good hunch

If you skip this, it still grows, just less well. The planner suggests it.

How it works: The carrot rust fly finds its host by the smell of carrot foliage. Onion and other allium volatiles growing among the carrots mask that scent, so fewer flies locate the row to lay eggs. Because the protection is the smell, it lasts only while the alliums are in the ground. Once they are pulled, the masking goes with them.

Evidence: checked against 1 source in the research-based literature.

The source

nevegetable.org

Carrot and Parsnip - Insect Control New England Vegetable Management Guide (regional land-grant extension)
Intercropping with onion has been shown to reduce damage by carrot rust flies.

Read the full rule › · open in the planner ›

Look at the grades. These are “a good hunch,” and none is “well established.” They’re offered with the uncertainty attached.

What about the famous pairings everyone repeats?

Two of the most-repeated deserve calling out by name. The first is the Three Sisters’ own nitrogen story, that the beans feed the corn this season:

Beans fix nitrogen that feeds the corn growing beside them, that season.

A good hunch

This claim only partly holds up. The planner won’t plan around this claim. What is known instead is below.

What is known: Rhizobia in legume root nodules do fix atmospheric N. Most of it is incorporated into the legume's own tissue. Some does move to a neighboring non-legume the same season via direct root contact and rhizodeposition, but the amount is small (a few percent of the neighbor's N uptake) and does not meet a heavy feeder's demand. The bulk of the benefit arrives the following season, after residues decompose.

Evidence: checked against 3 sources in the research-based literature.

The 3 sources

www.uaex.uada.edu

Creating a Three Sisters Garden Univ. of Arkansas Extension
Most of the nitrogen converted by the beans will not be available to the corn and pumpkins the first year; the bean roots have to break down to release nitrogen. Corn is a heavy nitrogen [feeder].

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Evidence of considerable C and N transfer from peas to cereals via direct root contact but not via mycorrhiza Hupe et al. 2021, Sci Rep 11:11424
N transfer rates of between 3.1 and 6.0% ... from soybean to maize

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Nitrogen uptake and transfer in a soybean/maize intercropping system in the karst region of southwest China
N transferred from soybean to maize account for 2.4%–3.3% of the N uptake of maize.

Beans will improve this ground for next year. They will not feed your corn this year.

Read the full rule › · open in the planner ›

Most of a legume’s fixed nitrogen goes into the legume itself and reaches its neighbors only when its residue breaks down, largely the following year. The beans improve the ground, but they aren’t fertilizing this year’s corn.

The marigold’s reputation as a general pest-repellent is mostly folk too. Its one real effect, suppressing certain nematodes, needs it grown as a full-season cover crop and tilled in. Dotting it along a border doesn’t do that.

Are there pairings I should actively avoid?

Some of this does work. Allelopathy, one plant chemically suppressing another, is real in a few well-documented cases, and the strongest is a plant to keep your vegetables away from:

Don't plant anything sensitive to walnut toxin (juglone) within a walnut tree's root zone. Nightshades are sensitive, and so are apple and cabbage.

Well established

If you skip this, the planting fails. The planner won’t allow it.

How it works: Juglans roots exude hydrojuglone, oxidized to juglone, a respiration inhibitor. The nightshades are highly sensitive; they wilt and die.

Evidence: checked against 2 sources in the research-based literature.

The 2 sources

hort.extension.wisc.edu

Black Walnut Toxicity UW-Madison / Wisconsin Horticulture (Joy, Hudelson & Jull, rev. 2024-02-28)
Vegetables such as tomato, potato, eggplant and pepper ... are particularly sensitive to juglone

yardandgarden.extension.iastate.edu

What plants are sensitive to the juglone produced by black walnuts? Iowa State Univ. Extension & Outreach, Yard and Garden FAQ
… members of the tomato family (tomato, potato, eggplant, pepper).
Remedy

Plant it outside the walnut's root zone, which takes in the whole drip line and beyond. There is no soil treatment for juglone.

Read the full rule › · open in the planner ›

How do I judge a companion claim myself?

When a chart claims plant X protects plant Y, ask one question: by what mechanism, and has it been shown? Usually no one knows, and the pairing is tradition. The explainer why there’s no companion-planting chart here makes the fuller case. In short, grow the Three Sisters for its real, structural mutualisms, because those are what hold up.

Further reading

Good places to read more about the technique on this page. The grade on each card comes from that card’s own sources.

Next in Myths → Which homemade pest and weed remedies work

The rules this guide leans on:

Plants in this guide: French marigold

All guides · Plan a bed